As reported yesterday in LiveScience, Mark Briffa, a behavioral ecologist published in Proceedings of the Royal Society B that hermit crabs have different personalities. In the past he has examined how they behave in combat and the value they place on a shell.

Dr. Briffa’s method for determining a crab’s personality was to flip crabs upside down and measure how long it took them to exit their shell. Based on this measurement he did a statistical comparison between a crabs behavioral consistency verses their behavioral plasticity. From this result he found a pattern in behavior and was able to show statistically that certain crabs are more bold than others.

In 2006, I remember reading an interesting article in the New York Times, by Charles Siebert, describing the different personalities of the giant Pacific octopus, an article definitely worth a read if you have the time. What was so surprising by this report was the distinctive stories passed to Charles by the marine biologist working at the aquarium. They could specifically describe the distinct personalities of each octopus, the jealous one or the one sensitive to light who would spray you with water if you flashed him , etc. This brings up a very interesting and perplexing ethical question that I think is far too often overlooked in the Biotech community. Is animal testing an appropriate way for testing new drugs or technologies? For example, monkeys clearly have personalities, so is it proper to be injecting them with Ebola to determine if the new vaccine is successful? These are questions that if the community is being intellectually honest, at a minimum, should be discussing. We all know the benefits from testing on animal models but have we recognized or even acknowledged some of the negatives.